Why Your LLM Keeps 'Fixing' the Same Bug
LLMs don't debug — they simulate what a fix looks like. Here is the architecture behind the pretense, the empirical evidence quantifying it, and the seven escape hatches that actually work.
글 읽기 →SOP 초안 작성, 감사 대응, CSV 및 21 CFR Part 11 규제 준수를 위한 특화 에이전트 연동 대화형 AI 인터페이스.
Saram Consulting바이오텍, 인공지능, 규제 컴플라이언스의 융합에 관한 심층 전략 및 실전 아키텍처 분석.
LLMs don't debug — they simulate what a fix looks like. Here is the architecture behind the pretense, the empirical evidence quantifying it, and the seven escape hatches that actually work.
글 읽기 →Every regulated life sciences company has the same problem — knowledge scattered across validated systems that cannot be consolidated. The 'meet data where it lives' retrieval architecture solves this, but only if you wrap every layer in compliance controls, lifecycle awareness, and immutable audit trails. Here is the full architectural translation.
글 읽기 →Reliable AI agents are built through a closed loop: trace real behavior, detect useful signals, classify failures, preserve them as test cases, run controlled experiments, and combine deterministic checks, calibrated model judges, and human review before release.
글 읽기 →Deploying AI agents into a GxP-regulated Quality department is not a chatbot project. It requires a validated, auditable operating system where specialized agents share governed infrastructure, and every output traces back to approved source documents. Here is the architecture, the regulatory framework, and the implementation roadmap that actually works.
글 읽기 →Dumping PDFs into a folder and calling it a training set will not work for GxP documents. SOPs, deviations, and CAPAs need four distinct dataset layers — each with a different format, training type, and behavioral purpose. Here is the architecture.
글 읽기 →